I just recently experienced the visually stunning motion picture
Oblivion in an IMAX theatre and I highly recommend it. Directed by Joseph
Kosinski (based on his graphic novel), this SF action thriller is worth seeing
on the big screen. It takes place in a devastated NYC (no longer recognizable
as a vast lonely landscape of buried skyscrapers and dried up rivers). It’s
2077, sixty years after aliens invaded and destroyed the moon and much of the
planet as consequence. This film is LARGE. Kosinki’s spectacular imagery and M83's other-wordly and evocative score must be seen large.
Technician Jack Harper (Cruise) and Victoria Olsen (Andrea Riseborough) are assigned to mop up the remaining resource extraction of a "fallen" Earth, before they join what's left of the human race, who have settled on Titan, Jupiter's moon. Victoria oversees operations and communicates with mission commander Sally (Melissa Leo) in the Tet (a large space station orbiting Earth) from the 3,000-foot high Sky Tower, a posh high-tech home/work station where she and Jack live. Meantime, Jack risks his life daily, servicing the droids that chase after "scavs" (remnant aliens), who keep sabotaging the giant resource harvesters.
Technician Jack Harper (Cruise) and Victoria Olsen (Andrea Riseborough) are assigned to mop up the remaining resource extraction of a "fallen" Earth, before they join what's left of the human race, who have settled on Titan, Jupiter's moon. Victoria oversees operations and communicates with mission commander Sally (Melissa Leo) in the Tet (a large space station orbiting Earth) from the 3,000-foot high Sky Tower, a posh high-tech home/work station where she and Jack live. Meantime, Jack risks his life daily, servicing the droids that chase after "scavs" (remnant aliens), who keep sabotaging the giant resource harvesters.
Jack and Victoria have been stationed there for five years
and are due to leave in two weeks. Faced with the prospect of leaving Earth, Jack
grows maudlin for humanity’s home. Without disclosing to Victoria or Sally,
he’s been collecting Earth memorabilia (e.g., baseball cap, toys, sunglasses,
books); It doesn’t help matters that he is haunted by dreams of living in
pre-war NYC with another woman (Olga Kurylenko).
Every day Jack leaves his ultra clean and tidy Sky Tower
home and descends to Earth's gritty and dangerous landscape. On some level, he thrills in the place, finding a strong connection between its vast and lonely landscape and his own identity. Jack is a man in search of an identity; he was 'mindwiped', after all (to keep the scavs from getting important intel if he was ever captured). Jack desperately summons shadows of memories and collects Earth memorabilia every chance he gets. "Is it possible to miss a place you've never been, to mourn a time you've never lived?" he reflects. When he finally learns what he truly is and the heinous role he (and those like him) unknowingly played in the near-destruction of humanity, Jack does the only thing he can; he sacrifices himself to save what's left of humanity and those he loves: "If we have souls, they're made of the love we share. Undimmed by time, unbound by death."
Showatcher.com calls Oblivion “a slick 21st century science fiction pulp
actioner” with genuinely amazing CGI and action set pieces. Showatcher adds
that “it was refreshing to witness a film that, though it did not break new
ground, held the attention of a jaded sci-fi audience.” A large part of its
attention appeal lies in its “techno-bass” musical score composed by Joseph Trapanese and Anthony Gonzalez with M83 (a French electronic/shoegaze band named after the spiral galaxy Messier 83). They elegantly orchestrated a score that was locked in step with the
narrative imagery of Claudio Miranda in a viscerally synchronized life-pulse.
The score surges and ebbs like an intelligent sea; at times assaulting the
senses with an open-throated tsunami of crushing sound; at others a throbbing caress
of longing nuance.
Many reviewers (see the litany on Rotten Tomatoes) have
trashed the film for various reasons, from plot holes and appropriation, mismanagement of suspense, to it being a Tom Cruise film. Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian calls Oblivion "bafflingly solemn, lugubrious and fantastically derivative sci-fi, which serves up great big undigested lumps of Total Recall, AI, Planet of the Apes--with little snippets of Top Gun."
Roy Klabin of Policymic is less kind: “Unfortunately, I got to see an early
preview and doubt it will satisfy even the most dim-witted of audiences…the
film’s unsubtle commentary on our own use of robotics in warfare is lackluster
and anticlimactic…the weak story is sprinkled with a heavy dosing of famous
actors [with] wooden-faced expressionless performances.”
David Dizon of ABS-CBN News calls Oblivion “an idea-movie,
except the idea seems like a rehash of ideas from other, much better sci-fi
flicks.” He and others cite Mad Max, Moon, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Halo, Matrix,
and Star Wars Episode 1 as examples. Dizon calls Oblivion “a pretty movie
served cold.” He claimed that the movie’s sin wasn’t in the “idea” department,
but in the way it was executed.
I couldn’t disagree more on all counts.
Oblivion is not a “pretty movie” and certainly not served
cold. Vast. Beautiful. Eerie. Elegant. Visceral. Memorable. I also saw many
similarities with the various films Dizon and others mentioned (I would include
Bladerunner and Solaris in the mix). But here’s the thing: science fiction is
the literature of “the large”. SF metaphorically explores our evolution, the
meaning of our existence and our place in the universe through premise and idea.
It is not surprising that viewers will see similarities with other films in Kosinski’s
meditation on the nature of the soul, identity, self-actualization, love and
community.
Several reviewers suggest that the film flirts with such big
questions” yet makes no effort to fully answer them. Showatcher adds, "Where the film falls short is not in its visual styles; and its pacing can be forgiven in that it actually builds to a satisfying conclusion. The film falters with its need to include cliched action set-ups... the film addresses some very interesting questions of the human soul, religion, and the meditation of loneliness; however, it never takes it as far as it could. Instead we are left with a slick visual style and action scenes."
Good art always asks the big questions; unlike propaganda
and polemic, good art also lets the viewers answer those big questions for
themselves. This concept is not as palatable to North America’s multiplex
crowd, eager for easily accessed answers.
Some movies are like appetizers or snacks. Others, like Kosinki's Oblivion, returns the film experience to a full meal, engaging all one's senses and where sound (its own character) marries with setting and actors to create an epic and heart-thrilling experience. Like many things in life, and certainly in good art, the most potent aspect of communication lies in the often subtle and oblique non-verbal narrative. Good art "shows more than it "tells".
For those receptive to his art, Kosinski--like Kubrick in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Soderbergh in Solaris--lets the imagery and score express a sensual dance that invokes both mind and heart.
In the final analysis, Oblivion is a simple film dressed elegantly. Oblivion goes beyond surface plot constructs and intellectual proselytizing; it dives deep into thematic representation to pose questions on identity, love, community, and the meaning of "home". Rather than offer up a platter-full of rhetoric, Kosinsky keeps the narrative slim; instead, he provides us with a multi-filigreed tapestry of sensual possibility.
And choices.
After making the startling discovery of who and what he is, Jack transcends his "mind wipe" and remembers what is worth remembering. In a final scene, Jack tells Sally why he is doing what he must do, even though it means his certain death. He quotes from an old book that he'd picked up earlier in the movie (Lays of Ancient Rome narrated by Centurian Horatius): "to every man upon this earth death cometh soon or late. And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods."
Some movies are like appetizers or snacks. Others, like Kosinki's Oblivion, returns the film experience to a full meal, engaging all one's senses and where sound (its own character) marries with setting and actors to create an epic and heart-thrilling experience. Like many things in life, and certainly in good art, the most potent aspect of communication lies in the often subtle and oblique non-verbal narrative. Good art "shows more than it "tells".
For those receptive to his art, Kosinski--like Kubrick in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Soderbergh in Solaris--lets the imagery and score express a sensual dance that invokes both mind and heart.
In the final analysis, Oblivion is a simple film dressed elegantly. Oblivion goes beyond surface plot constructs and intellectual proselytizing; it dives deep into thematic representation to pose questions on identity, love, community, and the meaning of "home". Rather than offer up a platter-full of rhetoric, Kosinsky keeps the narrative slim; instead, he provides us with a multi-filigreed tapestry of sensual possibility.
And choices.
After making the startling discovery of who and what he is, Jack transcends his "mind wipe" and remembers what is worth remembering. In a final scene, Jack tells Sally why he is doing what he must do, even though it means his certain death. He quotes from an old book that he'd picked up earlier in the movie (Lays of Ancient Rome narrated by Centurian Horatius): "to every man upon this earth death cometh soon or late. And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods."
Ben Kendrick of “Screenrant” summarizes what lies at the
core of the film: “Oblivion could have easily been a convoluted and indulgent
movie-going experience; instead, the film keeps a restrained focus on Jack’s
character journey—which, thankfully, is an “effective team” of drama and
post-apocalyptic adventure.”
Do me a favor; when you go into the theatre to watch this film, park your intellectual self at the door and bring all your senses with you. This film needs to be FELT. Prepare to participate.
Do me a favor; when you go into the theatre to watch this film, park your intellectual self at the door and bring all your senses with you. This film needs to be FELT. Prepare to participate.
Nina Munteanu is an
ecologist and internationally published author of novels, short stories and
essays. She coaches writers and teaches writing at George Brown College and the
University of Toronto. For more about Nina’s coaching & workshops visit www.ninamunteanu.me. Visit www.ninamunteanu.ca for more about her writing.
p.s. I just wanted to share something that director Joseph Kosinski said, that sheds additional light in his vision for Oblivion: "Sound is half the story, I truly believe that, and I always love those moments in cinema when you can kind of just lea in to the music and the imagery to tell the story. So it's a big part of this film and I kind of conceived the film as an in-camera science fiction film. I wanted it to feel as organic and real as possible. So that philosophy, I think, bled into the sound design as well."
ReplyDeleteYes, yes... :)
The most brilliantly beautiful film since Gladiator! A visual paradise on every artistic level.
ReplyDelete